Politics
Latest:
Protestors blockade Parliament
MoD data loss affects almost two million
Tories hang bank woes round Browns' neck
Payoff peer: Mandelson becomes a lord
Brown: We are the rock of stability
Taxpayers 'will be rewarded for bank investment'
Peers reject 42 day terror proposals
Lords will reject 42 days plans, says David Davis
Blair urged health ministers to grant Formula One exemption
UK councils seek assurance from Icelandic authorities
Politics Archive
All news archive
24-hour drinking failing to cut alcohol violence
01/07/2008
The government's controversial 24-hour licensing laws aimed at reducing alcohol-fuelled violence have in fact cost taxpayers £100 million and failed to cut disorder, it has been claimed.
In a survey by the Local Government Association (LGA) published today, seven out of ten police authorities, primary care trusts and councils said the number of alcohol-related incidents had gone up or stayed the same.
"The new laws have made no impact on disorder whatsoever," Sir Simon Milton, LGA chairman said.
Almost all of the local authority respondents, 93 per cent, claimed the Licensing Act 2003 had increased pressure on resources.
Those working in primary care trusts said there had been a 29 per cent rise in drink-related incidents, while police authorities reported a ten per cent rise.
The Licensing Act came into force on November 24th 2004 and established a single integrated system for licensing premises.
Today's report highlights that £100 million of taxpayers' money has been spent on the licensing laws.
"The report clearly shows the real financial strain that the new laws have had on councils, hospitals and other local services," Sir Simon said.
"Hospitals and the police are finding that they are called into action 24 hours a day, stopping disruption, breaking up fights and patching up the walking wounded.
"Town halls have been landed with an accumulated bill of £100million from the new laws and have been left with little option but to pass the cost on to the council taxpayer.
"It is totally unacceptable that the hard-pressed council taxpayer should be forced to pick up the bill for something that the government said would not cost them a penny."
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
StumbleUpon
Comments on this story
Add your comments here
No comments submitted yet