Politics
Latest:
Commons clashes over economy after Queen's Speech
What a lightweight: What Obama really thought of Cameron
UK to sign cluster bomb declaration
Speaker in the dark over MP arrest as Cameron accuses govt
Queen unveils slimmer legislative programme
Tax independence for Scotland rejected
'Bin Laden deputy' returned to UK jail
Police to investigate themselves over Tory arrest
Brown losing poll bounce
Welfare reform opposition reaches fever pitch
Politics Archive
All news archive
Litterbug motorists 'next' in town hall CCTV crackdown
12/04/2008
Town hall officials are keen to use CCTV footage against those dropping litter from their cars, a report suggests.
The Times quotes environment minister Joan Ruddock as saying many councils are keen to adopt fixed-penalty notices of up to £80 for littering if drivers can be caught using footage.
Those caught littering would not receive a criminal record or points on their licence but would be subject to prosecution if they failed to pay the fine, it reports.
Lobby groups like the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) are calling on the government for harsher measures to 'stop the drop' and the calls of president Bill Bryson for harsher action are being met with sympathy by Ms Ruddock.
"I share Bill's anger and concerns about the blight to rural areas," the Times quoted her as saying.
It follows the revelation yesterday that Poole borough council used covert surveillance against a family they suspected of not living in a local school's catchment area.
The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, which is usually reserved for the monitoring of criminal and terrorist suspects, was used by the council and has sparked concerns about town halls' growing preparedness to turn Britain into a 'surveillance society'.
According to today's Telegraph newspaper there are now over 1,000 applications a month for "directed surveillance" by councils and government departments.
Poole borough council's director for children's services John Nash told ITV's Evening News programme the case was "justified" because of the need "to be fair to all parents".
Human rights group Liberty said the surveillance was "ridiculously disproportionate", however.
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
StumbleUpon
Comments on this story
Add your comments here
No comments submitted yet